Bird
Brains, by E. Fuller Torrey
You might not know this,
but the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), the federal agency
responsible for research on mental illnesses, is the world's leading
center for study on how pigeons think. In fact, the agency funded
92 research projects on pigeons from 1972 to 2002.
During the same period,
by contrast, NIMH funded only one project on postpartum depression,
a devastating mental illness that affects women like Andrea Yates,
who killed her five children in Texas in 2001.
NIMH clearly has its priorities
wrong. Serious mental illnesses like Yates's account for 58 percent
of the total costs of mental illnesses in the U.S. Yet NIMH spends
just 5.8% of its resources on real search that could lead to more
effective treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, severe depression,
and other serious mental afflictions. Worse still, a new study from
the Treatment Advocacy Center (a group I am affiliated with) shows
that the percentage of NIMH research resources devoted to serious
mental illnesses actually fell over the past five years, even as the
institute's budget doubled from $661 million to $1.3 billion. At the
same time, federal costs for the care of seriously mentally ill individuals
have gone through the roof; they now total $41 billion yearly and
are rocketing upward at a rate of $2.6 billion a year. Expenditures
on the mentally ill are a big factor in the surging costs of Medicaid
and Medicare. Putting aside the fact that men and women with untreated
serious mental illnesses make up a third of the homeless population
and crowd our jails and prisons-transforming them into our de facto
mental institutions-we should, on economic grounds alone, be investing
heavily in research on the causes and treatment of these diseases.
Breakthroughs could save billions of dollars a year.
But NIMH doesn't see it
that way. During the past five years, it has funded research on how
Papua New Guineans think but refused to pay for a treatment trial
for schizophrenia; bankrolled research on self-esteem in college students
but nixed funding for research on bipolar disorder in children; and
paid for a study on how electric fish communicate but not for research
on why some individuals with schizophrenia refuse to take their medication.
If NIMH were an individual, a psychiatric assessment would be in order.
The diagnosis would be
terminal grandiosity. According to long-standing NIMH culture, the
institute's mission concerns mental health-and that means that all
forms of human behavior and social problems are legitimate research
topics. From NIMH's perspective, mental illness is only a small, and
not very interesting, part of its lofty purpose.
Since we can't call a psychiatrist
to examine NIMH, we should at least get Congress to take a closer
look. Congressional hearings should assess NIMH's priorities and require
that a minimum percentage of the institute's budget-50%, say-fund
research on serious mental illnesses. Furthermore, the General Accounting
Office, charged with evaluating federal programs, should also critically
examine NIMH's work.
Among many dubious recent
NIMH research projects are several on the idea of happiness, including
"Cultural Differences in Self-Reports of Well-Being." If
the money spent on researching happiness had gone instead toward developing
better treatments for depression, the NIMH likely would have added
a lot more to the sum of human felicity.
Dr. Torrey, president of
the Treatment Advocacy Center in Arlington, Va., is author of Surviving
Schizophrenia (Quill, 4th ed., 2001). This is adapted from the latest
City Journal.
Full report on NIMH Spending
on Serious Brain Disorders see:
A Federal Failure in Psychiatric
Research, November, 2003 (click on link below)
http://www.psychlaws.org/nimhreport/federalfailure.htm
Editor: If you agree with
Dr. Torrey - I recommend you contact both your local congressman and
your local NAMI office to let them know your thoughts.
Excerpt
from: In Mental Health Research, a Clash Over Funding Priorities
By Shankar Vedantam
Washington Post
Wednesday, December 24, 2003; Page A13
A recent report criticizing
the funding priorities of the federal government's National Institute
of Mental Health has reignited controversy over the organization's
direction and destiny -- with the top official at the institute echoing
some of the criticism himself.
The percentage of funds
devoted to severe mental illnesses has shrunk even as the institute's
budget has doubled, according to the report issued last month by psychiatrist
E. Fuller Torrey's Treatment Advocacy Center, the Public Citizen Health
Research Group and other mental health experts.
The report has created
sharp divisions among the many mental health experts, advocacy groups
and professional organizations that have stakes in the agency's mission
and direction, and has illustrated the growing gap between scientific
and popular visions of mental health research. Ultimately, the issue
may be decided not within the NIMH but on Capitol Hill.
"If you are a psychologist
out there studying people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder,
it's hard work," Torrey said in an interview. "It's infinitely
easier and much more pleasant to study the romantic lives of your
college students or how the students decorate their dorm rooms."
Like many of the disorders
they treat, the difference between the positions of Torrey and other
mental health experts lies in the details: What constitutes a serious
mental disorder? What is the best way to measure the impact of a disorder?
What basic neuroscience or behavioral research is relevant to a disorder?
Torrey's six disorders,
for instance, are a small fraction of the total number described in
the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual, which now runs to nearly 1,000 pages. The psychiatrist, whose
sister suffers from severe schizophrenia, said the six serious disorders
cost the United States at least $41.2 billion a year, more than half
of the direct costs of all mental illnesses. The serious illnesses
are relatively rare, but extremely disabling. Someone with persistent
major depression, Torrey said, cannot hold a job and "stays in
bed for 13 hours a day, and a trip to the store is all they can manage
-- and they have to think for a couple of hours before they can do
even that."
The serious disorders are
also a major cause of deprivation and poverty: Of 400,000 homeless
people in the United States, Torrey said about 130,000 have one of
the six serious mental disorders. Implicit in the report is a criticism
of the psychiatric establishment, which Torrey and his co-authors
said is more interested in treating the milder disorders of richer
people.
Kraut noted that, like
Torrey, he has not hesitated to take his concerns to Congress, saying
it is right that disagreements between Torrey and the other groups
be resolved through scientific and political debate. "It's not
Fuller's NIMH," he said.
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26270-2003Dec23.html
Schizophrenia
and Sunlight
The chance of developing
schizophrenia may be directly linked to how sunny it was in the months
before a person's birth, research suggests.
A lack of sunlight can
lead to vitamin D deficiency, which scientists believe could alter
the development of a child's brain in the womb. according to an article
in the New Scientist in 2002, research suggests people who develop
schizophrenia in Europe and North America are more likely to be born
in the spring.
A psychiatrist at the Queensland
Centre of Schizophrenia Research in Brisbane, Australia, made similar
findings, suggesting a lack of UV light during pregnancy tips the
balance towards schizophrenia in genetically susceptible people.
Note:
The following is a short summary of a very good article from Scientific
American Magazine that is freely available on the internet. To read
the full article (which we highly recommend) please click on the link
at the end of the summary.
December 15,
2003
Decoding Schizophrenia
A fuller understanding of signaling in the brain of people with this
disorder offers new hope for improved therapy
By Daniel C. Javitt and Joseph T. Coyle
Today the word "schizophrenia" brings to mind such names
as John Nash and Andrea Yates. Nash, the subject of the Oscar-winning
film A Beautiful Mind, emerged as a mathematical prodigy and eventually
won a Nobel Prize for his early work, but he became so profoundly
disturbed by the brain disorder in young adulthood that he lost his
academic career and floundered for years before recovering. Yates,
a mother of five who suffers from both depression and schizophrenia,
infamously drowned her young children in a bathtub to "save them
from the devil" and is now in prison.
The experiences
of Nash and Yates are typical in some ways but atypical in others.
Of the roughly 1 percent of the world's population stricken with schizophrenia,
most remain largely disabled throughout adulthood. Rather than being
geniuses like Nash, many show below- average intelligence even before
they become symptomatic and then undergo a further decline in IQ when
the illness sets in, typically during young adulthood. Unfortunately,
only a minority ever achieve gainful employment. In contrast to Yates,
fewer than half marry or raise families. Some 15 percent reside for
long periods in state or county mental health facilities, and another
15 percent end up incarcerated for petty crimes and vagrancy. Roughly
60 percent live in poverty, with one in 20 ending up homeless. Because
of poor social support, more individuals with schizophrenia become
victims than perpetrators of violent crime.
Medications
exist but are problematic. The major options today, called antipsychotics,
stop all symptoms in only about 20 percent of patients. (Those lucky
enough to respond in this way tend to function well as long as they
continue treatment; too many, however, abandon their medicines over
time, usually because of side effects, a desire to be "normal"
or a loss of access to mental health care). Two thirds gain some relief
from antipsychotics yet remain symptomatic throughout life, and the
remainder show no significant response.
An inadequate
arsenal of medications is only one of the obstacles to treating this
tragic disorder effectively. Another is the theories guiding drug
therapy. Brain cells (neurons) communicate by releasing chemicals
called neurotransmitters that either excite or inhibit other neurons.
For decades, theories of schizophrenia have focused on a single neurotransmitter:
dopamine. In the past few years, though, it has become clear that
a disturbance in dopamine levels is just a part of the story and that,
for many, the main abnormalities lie elsewhere. In particular, suspicion
has fallen on deficiencies in the neurotransmitter glutamate. Scientists
now realize that schizophrenia affects virtually all parts of the
brain and that, unlike dopamine, which plays an important role only
in isolated regions, glutamate is critical virtually everywhere. As
a result, investigators are searching for treatments that can reverse
the underlying glutamate deficit.
Multiple Symptoms
To develop better treatments, investigators need to understand how
schizophrenia arises--which means they need to account for all its
myriad symptoms. Most of these fall into categories termed "positive,"
"negative" and "cognitive." Positive symptoms
generally imply occurrences beyond normal experience; negative symptoms
generally connote diminished experience. Cognitive, or "disorganized,"
symptoms refer to difficulty maintaining a logical, coherent flow
of conversation, maintaining attention, and thinking on an abstract
level.
The public
is most familiar with the positive symptoms, particularly agitation,
paranoid delusions (in which people feel conspired against) and hallucinations,
commonly in the form of spoken voices. Command hallucinations, where
voices tell people to hurt themselves or others, are an especially
ominous sign: they can be difficult to resist and may precipitate
violent actions.
The negative
and cognitive symptoms are less dramatic but more pernicious. These
can include a cluster called the 4 A's: autism (loss of interest in
other people or the surroundings), ambivalence (emotional withdrawal),
blunted affect (manifested by a bland and unchanging facial expression),
and the cognitive problem of loose association (in which people join
thoughts without clear logic, frequently jumbling words together into
a meaningless word salad). Other common symptoms include a lack of
spontaneity, impoverished speech, difficulty establishing rapport
and a slowing of movement. Apathy and disinterest especially can cause
friction between patients and their families, who may view these attributes
as signs of laziness rather than manifestations of the illness.
When individuals
with schizophrenia are evaluated with pencil-and-paper tests designed
to detect brain injury, they show a pattern suggestive of widespread
dysfunction. Virtually all aspects of brain operation, from the most
basic sensory processes to the most complex aspects of thought are
affected to some extent. Certain functions, such as the ability to
form new memories either temporarily or permanently or to solve complex
problems, may be particularly impaired. Patients also display difficulty
solving the types of problems encountered in daily living, such as
describing what friends are for or what to do if all the lights in
the house go out at once. The inability to handle these common problems,
more than anything else, accounts for the difficulty such individuals
have in living independently. Overall, then, schizophrenia conspires
to rob people of the very qualities they need to thrive in society:
personality, social skills and wit.
New Treatment
Possibilities
...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DANIEL C. JAVITT and JOSEPH T. COYLE have studied schizophrenia for
many years. Javitt is director of the Program in Cognitive Neuroscience
and Schizophrenia at the Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
in Orangeburg, N.Y., and professor of psychiatry at the New York University
School of Medicine. His paper demonstrating that the glutamate-blocking
drug PCP reproduces the symptoms of schizophrenia was the second-most
cited schizophrenia publication of the 1990s. Coyle is Eben S. Draper
Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience at Harvard Medical School
and also editor in chief of the Archives of General Psychiatry. Both
authors have won numerous awards for their research. Javitt and Coyle
hold independent patents for use of NMDA modulators in the treatment
of schizophrenia, and Javitt has significant financial interests in
Medifoods and Glytech, companies attempting to develop glycine and
D-serine as treatments for schizophrenia.
For the Full
Article - go to:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000EE239-6805-1FD5-A23683414B7F0000&pageNumber=1
Out
of the Asylum, into the Cell
By Sally Satel,
M.D.
New York Times November 1, 2003
A new report
by Human Rights Watch has found that American prisons and jails contain
three times more mentally ill people than do our psychiatric hospitals.
The study confirmed what mental health and corrections experts have
long known: incarceration has become the nation's default mental health
treatment. And while the report offers good suggestions on how to
help those who are incarcerated, a bigger question is what we can
do to keep them from ending up behind bars at all.
The Los Angeles
County jail, with 3,400 mentally ill prisoners, functions as the largest
psychiatric inpatient institution in the United States. New York's
Rikers Island, with 3,000 mentally ill inmates, is second. According
to the Justice Department, roughly 16 percent of American inmates
have serious psychiatric illnesses like schizophrenia, manic-depressive
illness and disabling depression.
Life on the
inside is a special nightmare for these inmates. They are targets
of cruel manipulation and of physical and sexual abuse. Bizarre behavior,
like responding to imaginary voices or self-mutilation, can get them
punished--and the usual penalty, solitary confinement, only worsens
hallucinations and delusions.
How did we
get here? Actually, with the best of intentions.
Forty years
ago yesterday, President John F. Kennedy signed the Community Mental
Health Centers Act, under which large state hospitals for the mentally
ill would give way to small community clinics. He said of the law
that the "reliance on the cold mercy of custodial isolation will
be supplanted by the open warmth of community concern and capability."
Kennedy was
acting in response to a genuine shift in attitudes toward the mentally
ill during the postwar years. The public and lawmakers had become
aware of the dreadful conditions in the state hospitals, largely though
exposes like Albert Deutsch's book The Shame of the States and popular
entertainment like the movie The Snake Pit, both of which appeared
in 1948. In addition, Thorazine, an anti-psychotic medication, became
available in the mid-50's and rendered many patients calm enough for
discharge.
Between Kennedy's
signing of the mental health law in 1963 and its expiration in 1980,
the number of patients in state mental hospitals dropped by about
70 percent. But asylum reform had a series of unintended consequences.
The nation's 700 or so community mental health centers could not handle
the huge numbers of fragile patients who had been released after spending
months or years in the large institutions.
There were
not enough psychiatrists and health workers willing to roll up their
sleeves and take on these tough cases. Closely supervised treatment,
community-supported housing and rehabilitation were given short shrift.
In addition, civil liberties law gained momentum in the 70's and made
it unreasonably hard for judges to commit patients who relapsed but
refused care. Those discharged from state hospitals were often caught
in a revolving door, quickly failing in the community and going back
to the institution. And they were the lucky ones--many others ended
up living in flop-houses, on the streets or, as Human Rights Watch
has reminded us, in prison.
Reforms like
segregating mentally ill prisoners in treatment units would help.
Of course, the ultimate solution is keeping psychotic people whose
criminal infractions are a product of their sickness out of jails
in the first place. This requires a two-part approach. The first entails
repairing a terribly fragmented mental health care system. The most
important change would be liberating states from the straitjacket
of federal regulations surrounding the use of money from Medicaid
and Medicare--programs that account for two-thirds of every public
dollar spent on the mentally ill.
These regulations
force many states to make rigid rules dictating what services will
and won't be reimbursed, which forces practitioners and administrators
to perform bureaucratic gymnastics to circumvent them. For example,
Medicaid will not pay for clinicians who provide "assertive community
treatment"--a system in which professionals work as a team, making
home visits, checking on medication and helping patients with practical
day-to-day demands. Yet such teams have been proved to reduce re-hospitalization
rates by up to 80 percent.
Relaxing regulations
would be great progress in helping those mentally ill people who seek
treatment. Unfortunately, about half of all untreated people with
psychotic illness do not recognize that there is anything wrong with
them. Thus the second part of any sensible reform would be finding
ways to help patients who have a consistent pattern of rejecting voluntary
care, going off medication, spiraling into self-destruction or becoming
a danger to others.
One approach
is encouraging their cooperation with "treatment through leverage."
This process, not new but underused, involves making social welfare
benefits, like subsidized housing and Social Security disability benefits,
conditional to participation in treatment.
A more formal
approach is to have civil courts order people to enter community treatment.
New York State's Kendra's Law, named in memory of a woman killed in
1999 after being pushed into the path of a subway train by a man with
schizophrenia, is a good model. From 1999 to 2002, about 2,400 people
spent at least six months in mandatory community treatment under the
law.
And for those
who end up committing crimes, some states have developed special mental-health
courts that can use the threat of jail to keep minor offenders with
psychosis in treatment and on medication at least long enough for
the offenders to make informed decisions about treatment. Such efforts
may get help from Washington: last Monday the Senate approved a bill
authorizing $200 million for states to develop more mental-health
courts and other services for nonviolent, mentally ill offenders;
it awaits action in the House.
For many thousands
of mentally ill people, America has failed to make good on John F.
Kennedy's promise of 40 years ago. Releasing them from the large state
institutions was only a first step. Now we must do what we can to
free them from the "cold mercy" that comes with criminalizing
mental illness.
Sally Satel,
a psychiatrist and resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute,
is coauthor of the forthcoming One Nation Under Therapy.
American Enterprise
Institute
http://www.aei.org/news/newsID.19406/news_detail.asp
U.S.
Senate Passes Mentally Ill Offender Treatment and Crime Reduction
Act
(New York, November 5, 2003) Human Rights Watch welcomes the U.S.
Senates passage on October 29, 2003 of the Mentally Ill Offender
Treatment and Crime Reduction Act. Introduced in the Senate by Senator
Mike Dewine (R-Ohio), the bipartisan bill was cosponsored by Senators
Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Pete Domenici (R-NM),
Charles Grassley (R-IA), and Orrin Hatch (R-UT). The legislation authorizes
federal grants to support collaborations between mental health, criminal
justice, juvenile justice, and corrections systems to reduce the number
of mentally ill offenders in the criminal justice system, to improve
the mental health care received by those who are incarcerated, and
to increase the number of transitional and discharge programs to help
reduce the rate of recidivism of mentally ill offenders discharged
from prison and jail.
Human Rights Watch urges enactment of the Mentally Ill Offender Treatment
and Crime Reduction Act. The legislation reflects a realization that
a criminal justice approach, and particularly incarceration, may be
both unnecessary and counterproductive in many cases of nonviolent
misconduct by persons with mental illness. In addition, the legislation
moves beyond a purely punitive approach to conditions in prisons and
jails, recognizing that individuals as well as society are best served
when those mentally ill offenders who are behind bars are provided
necessary mental health services and programs while incarcerated and
post-release support upon release.
U.S. Representative Ted
Strickland (D-OH) introduced the bill in the House. With passage by
the Senate, Human Rights Watch hopes the House of Representatives
will move swiftly to pass it. We urge people to write their representatives
to urge them to support the Mentally Ill Offenders Treatment and Crime
Reduction Act.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Material
FULL
REPORT: Ill-Equipped: U.S. Prisons and Offenders with Mental Illness
HRW Report, November 5, 2003
Mentally
Ill Offender Treatment and Crime Reduction Act (Note: Large PDF
File - slow to download)
As introduced in U.S. Senate, June 5, 2003
Faulty wiring in the brain may cause early-onset schizophrenia
CHICAGO
Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to look into the brains
of children with schizophrenia, researchers have discovered
abnormalities in the white matter of the frontal lobe that
disrupt the transmission of signals regulating behavior,
according to a study presented today at the 89th Scientific
Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society
of North America (RSNA).
"Until now there's been no sophisticated method of
finding abnormalities in the white matter of the brain,"
said the study's lead author Manzar Ashtari, Ph.D., associate
professor of radiology and psychiatry at North Shore-Long
Island Jewish Health System and Albert Einstein College
of Medicine in New York. "Conventional magnetic resonance
(MR) imaging is limited in its ability to reveal brain myelination,
but DTI enables us to measure the myelination process."
Myelin is the
covering of nerve bundles that protects neurons and increases
their transmission efficiency. The accumulation of myelin
around these neurons is called myelination. In the human
developmental process, myelination correlates with maturing
patterns of behavior. In patients with schizophrenia, the
cells that carry out the process of myelination are defective.
Myelination activity
is at its strongest during the teen years. "This is
a critical time for adolescents who are still maturing emotionally,"
Dr. Ashtari said. "During the myelination process,
microstructural damage to developing white matter fiber
tracts may lead to developmental abnormalities. These are
the types of abnormalities we observed in the frontal white
matter regions in the children with schizophrenia."
Dr. Ashtari and
her team used DTI to study 12 adolescents with early-onset
schizophrenia and nine healthy, age-matched adolescents.
They found distinct differences in the white brain matter
of the frontal lobe, which controls numerous emotional,
cognitive and linguistic behaviors. When signals are disrupted,
abnormal behaviors result. "It's a problem with connectivity,"
Dr. Ashtari said. "It's like the wiring in a house,
only we are looking at the network of the brain--how the
brain is wired."
Schizophrenia
is a chronic and extremely disabling brain disease that
affects one out of every 100 people in the United States.
There is no cure.
According to
Sanjiv Kumra, M.D., co-author of the study and research
scientist at Zucker Hillside Hospital in New York, adolescents
are diagnosed with schizophrenia if they meet two of the
five criteria hallucinations, delusions, thought
disorder, bizarre behavior and negative symptoms (lack of
motivation, loss of enjoyment in activities) for
at least six months and display deterioration of functioning.
Children with schizophrenia are likely to exhibit developmental
delay and language and emotional problems before the onset
of psychotic symptoms.
DTI can identify
white matter abnormalities before major symptoms are apparent.
"Our goal is to detect and treat this disease early,
so we can stop the progression before full-fledged symptoms
develop," Dr. Ashtari said.
"Early-onset
schizophrenia is especially disheartening because so many
of these teens aren't diagnosed until they're adults,"
Dr. Kumra said. "Because these patients develop the
disease at an early age when they have not yet built their
lives, they tend to have a worse prognosis than those who
have adult-onset schizophrenia."
Dr. Ashtari hopes
that further DTI studies will yield more insight into the
inner workings of schizophrenia. "If the malformation
in the myelination process is the cause of schizophrenia,
future special efforts can be focused in production of therapeutic
agents that speed up or restart the myelination process,"
she said.
Co-authoring
the study with Drs. Ashtari and Kumra are Marjorie McMeniman,
Ph. D., Joshua Vogel, Alan Sloan Diamond, M.D., and Philip
Szeszko, Ph.D.
Drug
Implant Offers New Hope for People with Schizophrenia
By Ellen Barry, Globe Staff,
9/26/2003
PHILADELPHIA -- Researchers
said yesterday that they are prepared to seek FDA approval of a surgically
implanted tablet that could deliver daily doses of psychiatric medication
for as long as a year.
The implants might revolutionize
treatment of chronic mental illnesses like schizophrenia, which now
require patients to take daily cocktails of powerful medications.
For some, the implant of
haloperidol, a powerful antipsychotic drug, promises to stop the destructive
spirals of psychosis that occur when patients stop taking medication
because of side effects, logistical barriers, or lapses in memory.
But patients' rights advocates say that implants of psychiatric medication
would give the state coercive power unmatched since the age of the
lobotomy.
Dr. Steven Siegel, the
University of Pennsylvania researcher who is leading the development
of the implant, gathered with advocates yesterday to debate its impact
on the rights of people with mental illness.
"This is very doable
technology," said Siegel, director of the Stanley Center for
Experimental Therapeutics in Psychiatry. "It's not the science
that is limiting. If there really is interest, then I think drug companies
and other groups" would be happy to move forward with implants.
The implant consists of
a biodegradable polymer disk about 1 centimeter in diameter and 1
millimeter thick, which would be inserted during a 15-minute outpatient
surgical procedure, he said.
The disk, which could also
contain antidepressants or other medications, gradually disappears
over the course of a year, slowly releasing the drug as it dissolves.
If the patient needed to
be taken off the drug, its effects would immediately cease when the
tablet was removed, Siegel added. Currently, the nearest alternative
is an antipsychotic injection, which is not reversible and lasts for
only a month.
Siegel said he envisions
that the implant would be used only on a voluntary basis, by people
who have made the decision to accept medication for a year.
But Jonathon Stanley, a
lawyer and activist whose parents founded the Stanley Foundation after
he became severely psychotic as a young man, said he sees the implant
as useful only for people who refuse medication.
"I would not get [an
implant] right now, because I sometimes change the [dosage] a little"
to adjust to mood, said Stanley, who has pushed for tougher laws compelling
people to take psychiatric medication.
But he said he could have
used an implant as a young man, when "the only reason I was able
to take my pills was because my parents were there watching me like
a 2-year-old."
The first human trials
of the device are at least two years away, Siegel said. But with testing
completed on rats and rabbits, Siegel's laboratory and the three other
laboratories affiliated with the project approached the Food and Drug
Administration two weeks ago and requested a meeting to discuss beginning
trials to test the device's safety in humans, he said. The device
will not be on the market for at least five years.
Ethical concerns about
the device -- and psychiatry's long history of adopting treatments
that are later seen as civil-rights violations -- prompted scientists
to gather partisans on both sides of the argument for yesterday's
discussion.
"This is very, very
early to begin this conversation," said Paul Root Wolpe, a professor
of psychiatry and senior fellow at the University of Pennsylvania's
Center for Bioethics. "Very often, when there is this kind of
conversation, it's right before a pharma company is about to introduce
the product."
At the heart of yesterday's
debate were the antipsychotic medications themselves, which have become
the primary treatment for serious mental illness over the last 50
years.
The newer generation of
antipsychotics were greeted as miracle drugs when they were introduced
about 15 years ago, and their sales have climbed to become the fourth
highest-selling class of drugs in the nation, according to IMS Health,
which tracks industry sales.
But once outside hospital
walls, patients frequently stray from the drug regimens. One study
showed that over a two-year period, 80 percent of people with schizophrenia
stopped taking their medication at least temporarily, Siegel said.
But one clinician interviewed
said that if a long-term medication implant is administered ethically,
it could be an enormous boon to patients struggling to build an independent
life.
"I see so many people
who so often go off medication because they lost their prescription,
their doctor was on vacation, they ran out of medication, the pharmacy
was closed," said Laurie Goldman, a clinical psychologist who
sees severely mentally ill patients at the South End Community Health
Center. "They ended up homeless. They ended up burning down houses."
Audience members raised
concerns yesterday about possible widespread use of implants, most
pointedly, the danger that they would be used in the criminal justice
system as an alternative to imprisonment.
Others worried that the
managed-care industry would promote implants because they would offer
the cost savings of reduced psychiatric visits.
Unrepresented in the gathering
of patients' advocates yesterday were the most seriously ill people,
those so disorganized and isolated that they are unable to manage
their medications at all.
Excerpted from: The Boston
Globe, 9.26.3003
----------------------
Your Opinion on Schizophrenia
Drug Delivery Implant
Note: If you believe -
as we do - that this new medication delivery system would be a valuable
addition to the options available to people with schizophrenia -please
send an email message of support to:
Mary Dankert, Email:
mdankert@bbl.med.upenn.edu
This drug delivery system
may not be developed if people don't let the University of Pennsylvania
know that this is a valuable addition to the options available for
treatment of schizophrenia.
Note: I see this as good
news for helping the many people who have schizophrenia and who -
because of the damage to the brain caused by schizophrenia - find
it very difficult to remember to take medications on a regular basis.
This effort is supported by the Stanley Research Foundation - a leading
Non-profit that supports a great deal of schizophrenia research to
improve treatment for people with schizophrenia. - Editor.
For More information on
this new drug delivery system - see:
http://stanley.med.upenn.edu/
For more information on
the Stanley Foundation Schizophrenia Research programs, see:
http://www.stanleyresearch.org/programs/stanley_research.asp
State
Lawmakers Preview Award-Winning Documentary of Artist's Struggle With
Schizophrenia at NCSL Annual Health Policy Forum
12/10/03 6:02:00 PM
WASHINGTON, Dec. 10 /U.S.
Newswire/ -- Artist John Cadigan today shared his story of his struggle
with schizophrenia with more than 400 members of the National Council
of State Legislatures, comprised of state legislators and staff from
across the country at their annual Fall Forum to discuss health policy.
In an effort to challenge existing negative stereotypes about those
who struggle with severe mental illnesses, Cadigan filmed his life
for over 10 years.
Cadigan's story came to
life at the NCSL's annual Fall Forum through a preview of excerpts
from the artist's documentary, People Say I'm Crazy. The documentary
has been sweeping film festivals throughout North America, winning
major awards such as the Humanitarian Award at the Vancouver International
Film Festival and the Best Documentary award at the Chicago International
Film Festival. The documentary has recently been purchased by HBO/Cinemax
for airing in summer 2004.
In addition to the preview,
Cadigan's unique art depicting his vision was also displayed at the
NCSL meeting. A relief printmaker, Cadigan has exhibited his woodcuts
in galleries and museums nationwide.
"Society turns away
from those who suffer from mental illnesses such as schizophrenia,"
Cadigan said. "Fifty-five million Americans suffer from some
form of mental illness. It is important that we foster understanding
within society that these are brain disorders and these disorders
can be successfully treated, so there is hope for people to return
to productive lives."
As states confront the
worst budget shortfalls since World War II, investment in mental health
services is in great jeopardy. According to the National Mental Health
Association (NMHA), nearly two-thirds of states cut funding for mental
health services in 2002.
"States can choose
to invest in effective, community-based services or pay a greater
price through increased emergency room visits, homelessness and an
overburdened criminal justice system," said Senator Peter Knudson,
assistant majority whip for the Utah State Senate and emcee of the
event. "John Cadigan's story shows us how important it is to
provide timely and appropriate treatment for those who suffer from
mental health disorders."
"The search for appropriate
treatment was extremely difficult for my family and me," Cadigan
said. "My story is not unique, but sharing it puts a face on
the thousands of other sufferers out there who need timely and effective
care. We must encourage decision makers to dramatically improve the
quality and availability of mental health services which saves society
an enormous amount of taxpayer resources in the long term."
Cadigan, now 33, was diagnosed
with schizophrenia in 1991 while he was a senior at Carnegie Mellon
University. From the beginning of his illness, he decided to document
his experiences on film. His sister, Katie Cadigan, a professional
documentary film producer and director who has taught film at Stanford
University, used her knowledge to teach John how to film himself so
that he could explore what was happening to him.
The film follows Cadigan
and his family as he battles schizophrenia, and captures his setbacks
and milestones on his journey to build a stable life. Cadigan's blunt
honesty helps audiences to understand the overwhelming challenges
facing those with severe mental illnesses.
The film was made possible
in part through a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts,
and through an unrestricted educational grant from AstraZeneca as
part of its commitment to foster greater understanding and compassion
about mental illness.
People Say I'm Crazy was
co-produced by Academy Award winning producer Ira Wohl. The film is
scheduled for theatrical release in New York in April 2004. It is
currently in educational distribution.
For more information about
People Say I'm Crazy, log onto http://www.peoplesayimcrazy.org